Month: February 2024

Israel’s Adoption of the UNCITRAL Model Law on Arbitration — Was the Knesset Misled? (Part V)

© Sherby & Co., Advs.

Since January 11, 2024, our firm has published a series of analyses regarding specific aspects Israel’s new statute (in Hebrew, חוק הבוררות המסחרית הבין-לאומית, תשפ”ד 2024), which adopted the Model Law of the United Nations International Trade Commission (commonly known as the “UNCITRAL Model Law”) for international arbitrations taking

המשך לקרוא…

No Longer A Proposal – The Amendment To Adopt The UNCITRAL Arbitration Model Law Passes, Becoming Israeli Law

© Sherby & Co., Advs.

(c) 2024 Sherby & Co., Advs. In recent weeks, we have published several blog posts regarding what had been the proposed amendment to Israel’s arbitration law. That amendment passed this week. This blog will continue to address issues of concern regarding Israel’s adoption of the UNCITRAL Model Law. In this context, we are mindful of

Continue Reading…

The Proposed UNCITRAL Model Law — Does Israel Need It? (Part IV – One Arbitrator or Three?)

© Sherby & Co., Advs.

As reported in our post of January 11, Israel’s Knesset is considering adopting, for international arbitrations taking place in Israel, the Model Law of the United Nations International Trade Commission (commonly known as the “UNCITRAL Model Law”). In the first two parts of this series, we examined the circumstances

Continue Reading…

The Proposed UNCITRAL Model Law — Does Israel Need It? (Part III, determining arbitrability)

© Sherby & Co., Advs.

(c) 2024 Sherby & Co., Advs. As reported in our posts of January 11 and 31, Israel’s Knesset is considering adopting, for international arbitrations taking place in Israel, the Model Law of the United Nations International Trade Commission (commonly known as the “UNCITRAL Model Law”). On January 11, we began a series of posts regarding

Continue Reading…