The hallmark of a good international lawyer is his/her ability to keep his/her client as informed as possible, so that the client can make knowledgeable decisions about legal matters occurring at distances of thousands of miles. A corollary of that principle is that, despite the complexities caused by foreign law, foreign language, and foreign cultures, the international lawyer must ensure that his/her foreign client's relationship with him/her mirrors that client's relationship with its legal counsel in its home jurisdiction.
At the law firm of Sherby & Co., Advs., we are committed to fulfilling these goals for our clients, every day.
Decades of experience advising Israeli and non-Israeli business people
regarding their transactions and disputes.
Companies do not retain us for routine cases. The more complex the dispute, the more it pays to consult with us.
Read MoreAs is the case with international litigation, in international arbitration, our leadership, experience, and creativity are second to none.
Read MoreWho's Who Legal named our law firm as one of the top three Israeli firms in mergers and acquisitions.
Read MoreFor non-Israeli manufacturers – regardless of the product industry – we are the "go-to" law firm for Israeli product liability law.
Read MoreDistribution and licensing agreements: in virtually every industry, we have represented manufacturers, and we have represented distributors.
Read MoreInternational joint venture transactions require interdisciplinary knowledge and experience – our clients benefit from our having both.
Read MoreOur blog covers global litigation and arbitration issues from (mostly) an Israeli perspective.
(c) 2024 Eric S. Sherby In January and February of this year, I posted a number of pieces on this blog regarding Israel’s adoption of the UNCITRAL Model Arbitration Law. One of the primary criticisms that I expressed of the new law is that it sets a default number of three (3) arbitrators (whereas under Israel’s
© 2024 Eric S. Sherby Regardless of one’s political leanings, there is probably unanimity that the United States Senate does not rush to ratify a unilateral treaty merely because an administration (Democratic or Republican) decided to sign it. Rather, the U.S. Senate traditionally takes the time necessary to consider the pros and cons of any
